Comments on: Canals: summary of recent consultation responses https://backup.cyclesheffield.org.uk/?p=10519 back up site for cyclesheffield Sun, 04 Jan 2015 18:07:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.31 By: Mick https://backup.cyclesheffield.org.uk/?p=10519#comment-149 Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:40:42 +0000 http://www.cyclesheffield.org.uk/?p=10519#comment-149 Simon

I agree. But this was a proposal by SCC to whoever was pulling the South Yorks/ShfCityRegion LocalSustainableTransportFund bid together.

WE can ask for clarification at next Cycle Forum but I’m pretty sure that is what Paul Sullivan said.

I refer you to this http://www.cyclesheffield.org.uk/2014/07/31/green-routes-urban-routes-and-what-should-we-focus-on-in-the-lower-don-valley/
and nobody has siad we have got the intention wrong.

]]> By: wildnorthlands https://backup.cyclesheffield.org.uk/?p=10519#comment-148 Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:49:01 +0000 http://www.cyclesheffield.org.uk/?p=10519#comment-148 Not sure I see the point of making the canal towpath more cyclable. We already have the five weirs walk as a leisure route between the city centre and Meadowhall, (with an access route only a few yards from the canal basin) while the two main roads between these centres are crying out for some decent cycling infrastructure as are many other key routes in the city, There could be mileage in making the towpath a bit safer for everyone but the focus should be on key utility routes.

]]>