All posts by Mick

CycleSheffield Annual Report June 2014

Annual Report of Cyclesheffield, a cycle campaign group.

Presented at the AGM on 12 June 2014

in the Rutland Arms, Brown St

on Thursday 12th June 2014

starting at 8 pm.

Trams and Tram-Trains

Bike Carriage  

Cycle Sheffield’s campaign for a trial of bike carriage on trams and tram-trains is currently on hold. After a huge amount of work, with Sheffield City Council’s endorsement and the support of 5 out of 6 of our local MPs, not all of Sheffield’s representatives attended the South Yorkshire Integrated Transport Authority meeting where the interior design layout of the tram-trains was debated. The votes for and against a design that could accommodate bike carriage were equal so the Chair – from Doncaster – had a casting vote and our campaign failed. However Sheffield’s Cycling Inquiry Report, which is likely to be approved by the City Council, recommended “that the Sheffield City Region Authority and public transport operators identify opportunities and commit to undertake pilot schemes within the next 12 months, with priority be given to trials on the Supertram network.” We will also await the results of Edinburgh’s trial.

Tramtracks

CycleSheffield notes that nobody keeps comprehensive data on the incidents and injuries caused by collisions with the tramtracks.  This was confirmed at the Cycling Inquiry.  We are negotiating with NGH to keep global data on the number of incidents being presented at A&E,  We have raised this issue at Cycle Forum and wish to pursue it so that reliable data on the scale of this problem is kept and the tram company takes tramtrack safety seriously.  In light of this and the difficulties that the tram system has caused we are in principle opposed to any extension of the tram system on any more existing roads and streets

Streets Ahead

We have had some success with our spreadsheet for noting opportunities for improvements for Streets Ahead.  The schedule for works is frequently changed and it has proved impossible to survey areas effectively to feed into the process.

We are concerned about the web-based system for reporting faults because the feedback to the reporting is inadequate.  All you get is a number but no record of what you stated, it is noteable that Rotherham has a better feedback for people who report faults.  Mind you communication for SCC officers with Streets Ahead is not straightforward either.

We have had members note that things reported have not been done or they have been fobbed off with nothing wrong, eg faulty traffic lights on Division St, but when exec have taken it up then it is admitted that there are faults.  This should not be the way to get things done,

The Streets Ahead contract lasts until 2037

Cycle Forum

Having been through a hiatus the Cycle Forum now has a good attendance although somewhat male-dominated. We have been able to raise a number of important issues with the council through this channel. The forum now has a road schemes sub-committee where schemes are discussed with CycleSheffield before they get to planning application stage.

Ecclesall Rd

Ecclesall Rd “Smart Routes” – we fought a sustained campaign to keep the bus lanes, or at least have the bus lanes replaced by cycle lanes, and won some “concessions” on this (concessions probably the wrong word as the council should be catering for cyclists as matter of course.)  We stopped the pavement up to Banner X being converted to shared use which would be dreadful for everyone.

There are a number of improvements going in for cyclists as part of the scheme so the next step is to keep a close eye on these, make sure any snags are rectified and look at what needs doing in the next round of funding.

5WW & towpath.

The 5WW is a cause for concern.  Much of it needs lighting, repaving, widening to make an adequate cycle route for everyday transport.  The towpath from Meadowhall to Rotherham Town centre was opened and is good to use in daylight.  However the 5WW route at Meadowhall is only ‘permissive’ and has been dug up with little warning and no adequate rerouting for an official part of the NCN to put in utilities and the towpath is now closed for months with no adequate alternative provided whilst the Bus Rapid Transit route is put in

Penistone Rd

Mixed results here and the good news is that the proposal to increase the speed limit to 40mph between Shalesmoor and the Barracks has not been approved.  There will be some improvements to the cycle route although these are thought of as not good being enough. As with Eccie Rd we need to monitor what goes in on the ground, make sure any blindingly obvious defects are rectified and continue to press for improvements in future. Whilst less than perfect we will have a continuous off-road/quiet road route from Catchbar Lane to Kelham Island at last.

Asline Rd/Sheaf Valley Cycle Route

We fought off a couple of threats to this route, but we need to maintain vigilance and continue to press for improvements. The provision on Little London Road and Archer Road is poor – the lack of a pavement through the railway bridge by the “Lake District” is a disgrace.

We need the SYITA to decide what they want to do about improving public transport along the Sheaf Valley corridor – better heavy rail? Trams? Tram-train? so that cycle routes can be designed to link in with PT provision making the best use of the available space.

Claywheels Lane

We lost our objection to the planning application for the Sainsbury’s at the entrance to Claywheels Lane. e got one concession that the shared use path at Sainsburys would be increased from 3m to 3.5m; we could not have more otherwise it would reduce the car park.  Our questions about the quality of the cycle access within the site were not answered.  The signalled junctions are now being installed and we believe that the number of crossings that cyclists will have to make will deter families and diffident cyclists from accessing NCN 627.  The roundabout at Penistone Rd/Herries Rd/Leppings Lane is being taken out.  There is no designated route for NCN 627 from Hillsborough Leisure Centre to Claywheels Lane and whilst there is a line on the green routes proposal we have no more info on this possible major commuting, tourist and recreational route. Frankly this is a 20th Century solution being installed 14 years into the 21st Century.

Graves Leisure centre planning applications objections and surveys

CycleSheffield opposed the planning application on the grounds of an inadequate transport assessment and travel plan. We undertook our own survey and showed that the professional survey on which the transport assessment was based was inadequate.  We were concerned that sustainable transport did not really figure at all nor did the needs of local neighbourhoods.  Opportunities for minor improvements and changes to make better provision for walking and cycling were missed.  This application was part of Sheffield’s Move More! plan and we think the best way to get the greatest number of Sheffielders to move more is to design urban space and highways so that people see walking and/or cycling as a genuine transport choice.  We have said to SCC that we see this as a test case and that we expect consultants and engineers to get things right in the first place and not for us to have to be forever critiquing poor work. We also sent our objection to appropriate cllrs and officers and they have taken our concerns v seriously and acted on them.

As far as we know the planning application has been withdrawn and the client is no longer Sheffield City Trust who own SIV, the operating company.  A new planning application will be put in soon.

Liaison with SYP

We have met with the Police Commissioner and a Chief Inspector to talk about liaison with SYP on cycling matters in general. A Road Police Inspector is now part of the Cycle Forum and he has ‘solved’ the issue of football coaches parking on Asline Rd. He was also v helpful in our liaison with the SYP about the Space for Cycling Ride.  This liaison continues both formally and informally.

Road Justice,

We have supported this campaign.  Two members rec’d media training (free) from the campaign.  Members have attended court hearings concerning “causing [cyclist’s] death by …” but court hearings are difficult to attend as they are timetabled v late and often deferred

Twenty’s Plenty

This year 20splentyforsheffield has got a steering group together (not just cyclists!), attended the Annual 20 Conference in London, and continued its public campaign to get the Council to get a move on with the implementation of 20mph areas in Sheffield. (ie to do so by 2017) We are trying to put our message out to other relevant agencies (Police/Public Health) to get them on board, and plan to get out to the newest 20 area Community groups to give talks promoting compliance. A transcript of this talk see ‘letter to councillors’), giving a good summary of the case for a default 20mph limit in Sheffield, can be found on the 20splentyforsheffield website: http://www.20splentyforsheffield.org.uk/

Cycling Inquiry

This report will receive a response from Cabinet and the actions to be taken by SCC in July 2014

CycleSheffield proposed a local cycling inquiry in the summer 2013 to provide a Sheffield equivalent to the Parliamentary Get Britain Cycling report.  We are pleased that the Council listened, sought and received support from all parties, and set up this inquiry.  We have been part it, providing evidence, experience and expertise.

It certainly got a massive response because there were nearly 300 submissions of evidence from national and local organisations, and hundreds of Sheffielders, who all shared their cycling experience and offered positive ideas. Councillors, officers and ourselves organised and analysed the evidence, identified the salient points and learned from what is happening with cycling not only in Sheffield but also elsewhere in the UK and overseas.

The Get Sheffield Cycling report sets out 17 recommendations recognising that cycling has much to contribute to transport, health, local business and the environment – not forgetting that cycling with confidence is joyful!

CycleSheffield knows that the recommendation to start all planning and development by putting the needs of pedestrians and cyclists first is already being  put in place.  Developing cycling is not expensive compared to the total transport, leisure, tourism and air quality budgets and it has a great return for every pound spent.  We trust that all the recommendations will be the basis of policy and practice for cycling in Sheffield in the short and medium term.

Our collaboration on this work is encouraging for our input to the next cycling action plan

SFNR

There have been 10 SFNRs since the last AGM including the largest one ever in Sep 13 with 70 riders to the  sweet shop in Rotherham – before the towpath was closed! Attendance per ride is approx 40 and rides have been provided in collaboration with Foodbanks, Velophone, and Green Homes.   Sadly we seem to have completed the quadrilogy of Railways Rides.  The mailing list stands at approx 250 and there are a 220 likes on the fb page.  Two of the rides are planned to be turned into “Iconic Sheffield Sky Rides” for August 2014

Women-only Rides

As usual we have had 3 women-only rides this year: a full day ride during Bike Week, the ‘Rivers and Reservoirs’ route, for a picnic at Damflask serenaded by a cuckoo; a half day ‘Three Reserves’ ride visiting Salmon Pastures, Blackburn Meadows and Sunnybank to celebrate the Patron Saint of Cycling Day in October; and a half day ride for croissants and cakes at The Cock Inn in Oughtibridge through Beeley Woods, to celebrate International Women’s Day at the beginning of March. All were very enjoyable and the latter two were over particularly flat routes to encourage new riders; this was extremely successful and there were 27 of us on the latest ride – our record number of attendees.

Cyclenation

Cyclenation is our umbrella organisation comprising the federation of campaign groups across the country.  Simon Geller, our campaigns manager is its secretary. Having recognised that while some campaigning groups including CycleSheffield are doing well, others are struggling.  This is leading to a drop in revenues that if not reversed would eventually cause the organisation to go bankrupt. Underlying this is the need for a vibrant and growing cycle campaign movement in the UK.

The Cyclenation Board is legally responsible for the financial viability of the organisation and take this responsibility seriously. We therefore launched a consultation about the future direction the organisation should take, going back to first principles about what Cyclenation is for. This culminated in a workshop at the AGM which came up with some clear proposals for the organisation. At the same time a new Board was elected wth some new faces so we are hoping to revitalise the federation. Simon will report further as the year progresses.

Space for Cycling,

Saturday 17 May may well be the biggest bike ride in Sheffield this year and it certainly will be the happiest.  Approximately 240 people celebrated their desire to cycle in Sheffield in a joyful 4.5 mile ride from town centre out to Hunters Bar and back again via Nether Edge (the TdF peloton is only 198 riders ​ – and on traffic-free roads​).  It was an inclusive ride with all sorts from children to pensioners, men and women, gay and straight, black and white and dressed in all sorts on all sorts of bikes.  There were many more women than you would usually see on bike rides.

All were answering CycleSheffield’s call for people who cycle to demonstrate their desire for Sheffield to see itself as a cycling city and for councillors and officers to make Space for Cycling.  The campaign wants a reduction in ‘rat runs’ in residential areas, better junction design and segregated bike lanes on busy roads, a joined-up cycling network in the city centre and in suburban centres, and that Sheffield starts designing and constructing NOW so that every Sheffield child is able to cycle safely to school.

Saturday 17 May was a real success. For 240 people to turn up to show their desire for Space for Cycling and have a joyful time riding through our city together sends a message to councillors that cycling is something that many more people would do if they felt the roads were designed and built better and space and transport planning put the needs of vulnerable road users first.  As we cycled around we received so much support from people on the streets and people in cars and buses towards this ride that it shows that cycling in Sheffield will be popular.  This is our mandate to say that Sheffielders want Sheffield to be a cycling city NOW; so, Sheffield City Council just do it.

So far 6 councillors have shown their support by signing up to the campaign.

Poynton

Chris Rust and Mick Nott went and spent a morning surveying and talking to locals about the road junction at Poynton, which has raised a lot of national interest in street and highway design – away from signalled junctions and crossings to design by narrowing streets and slowing traffic to a slow but steady pace rather that stop-start all can move along or cross much more pleasant streets.  We think SCC should be looking at trialing a design like this – Pensitone Rd would have been ideal, – Hunters Bar roundabout for the future?

We have written a preliminary report, more work is needed and we have discussed having similar site visits with SCC officers

Air Quality Action Plan and Director of Public Heath Report

These SCC documents, as well as national reports and policies, argue that active travel is a way of reducing air pollution, congestion, obesity, diabetes etc and increasing health and wellbeing.  CycleSheffield have perused them and have been using them extensivley in arguing the case that SCC must support, promote and invest in cycling.  We believe that this strategy has been effective.

Sky/TdF

Sky Rides start in Sheffield, and the rest of SY, this summer. SCC pays British Cycling to provide these and sees them as part of the Move More! plan.  Sky have asked CyceSheffield for advice and help, and the ride programme manager came to a meeting to talk about the plans.  Some past SFNRs will be adapted to become part of the programme.  There will be a Sky Ride on closed off traffic free streets in Sheffield on Sun Aug 10 2014.  Hopefully we will be able to have the CycleSheffield stall there.

Sheila McKechnie Foundation

SMK supports campaigners with info and training.  In the last year we have supported three members to attend the introduction to campaigning workshops and Mick Nott attended a campiagning Master Class.  Mick also reviewed their website content and was then invited to write some further support materials for the SMK website drawing on CycleSheffield experiences.  CycleSheffield rec’d a £150 payment for this work.

SCCI

CycleSheffield is a member of the SCCI Transport Forum.  The SCCI have taken an interests in the work we did to guage the size of the cycling economy in Sheffield and also submitted a (positive) response to the Cycling Inquiry.  CycleSheffield is make a presentation on the business case for cycling to the SCCI Transport Forum in June 2014

Sheffield Live! Local TV

CycleSheffield proposed a local TV prog about cycling.  THis proposal was critiqued, revsied and submitted as The Joy of Cycling. It has now been selected for a ‘treatment’ to firm it up into a production of series of progs about cycling and cyclists in Sheffield.  Mick Nott and Chris Rust worked up the original ideas and now other CycleSheffield members, Jeremy Lawrence and Adam Page, are to take the lead on this project. Production will start late summer/autumn.  Exciting!

Membership

The administration of the membership is now a reasonably smooth procedure and we send out new cards at the beginning of each month. At the beginning of June we had 255 primary members and 172 household members, making 427 all together. Mick Nott handles enquiries, reminders, etc, Helen Hess provides the subscriptions updates and Tony Cornah administers the database and does the printing and posting each month.

Publicity

Cycle Sheffield is promoted via various channels – web site, twitter, word of mouth, presence at various local events, e.g. Heeley Festival, Green Fair. Business cards & small display have been distributed to most bike shops in Sheffield, these are regularly replenished.

CycleSheffield Matters for the SCC Cycle Forum 20 May 2014

Every couple of months there is a Cycle Forum, a meeting with SCC and parties who have a stake in cycling in the city.

CycleSheffield usually brings a set of issues to raise with SCC and other parties.

We see it like an open letter to the Council – matters said which then should not be ignored or forgotten.

CycleSheffield Matters for CycleForum Tue 20 May 2014

1. CycleSheffield would like SCC to note:

  1. the national Space for Cycling Campaign and the local Sheffield Space for Cycling Campaign with the Space for Cycling Big Ride that took place on May 17. see below
  2. our thanks for the recent meeting and discussion with the SCC Cycle Champion, David Caulfield to discuss cycling issues;
  3. the Cycle Expo meeting in Leeds May 1 & 2 2014  – only two officers from SY (one from Sheffield) went!
  4. the CycleSheffield programme for Bike Week – check out www.cyclesheffield.org.uk
  5. one of our members has reported a completed highway development to Streets Ahead as dangerous for cyclists. We support his action.
  6. we welcome the statement that SCC will do walking and cycle audits for any development that affects a public highway.  We must also say that we feel like we have been here before and we would more warmly welcome any evidence that this is actually being done

2. CycleSheffield’s Space for Cycling Big Ride

  1. on Saturday 17 May may well be the biggest bike ride in Sheffield this year and it certainly will be the happiest.  Approximately 240 people celebrated their desire to cycle in Sheffield in a joyful 4.5 mile ride from town centre out to Hunters Bar and back again via Nether Edge (the TdF peloton is only 198 riders).  It was an inclusive ride with all sorts from children to pensioners, men and women, gay and straight, black and white and dressed in all sorts on all sorts of bikes.  There were many more women than you would usually see on bike rides.
  2. All were answering CycleSheffield’s call for people who cycle to demonstrate their desire for Sheffield to see itself as a cycling city and for councillors and officers to make Space for Cycling.  The campaign wants a reduction in ‘rat runs’ in residential areas, better junction design and segregated bike lanes on busy roads, a joined-up cycling network in the city centre and in suburban centres, and that Sheffield starts designing and constructing NOW so that every Sheffield child is able to cycle safely to school.
  3. Saturday 17 May was a real success. For 240 people to turn up to show their desire for Space for Cycling and have a joyful time riding through our city together sends a message to councillors that cycling is something that many more people would do if they felt the roads were designed and built better and space and transport planning put the needs of vulnerable road users first.  As we cycled around we received so much support from people on the streets and people in cars and buses towards this ride that it shows that cycling in Sheffield will be popular.  This is our mandate to say that Sheffielders want Sheffield to be a cycling city NOW; so, Sheffield City Council just do it.

3. Penistone RdIs a formal response/comment on the process and decision making wrt to the Penistone Rd scheme and, what we consider, the specious arguments used in this case

  1. The modelling data presented by officers did not allow proper comparisons or consider all users Traffic flows modelled at 30mph (as part of Smart Routes scheme); scheme proposed for 40mph but not modelled at this speed. Emissions modelled (or only estimated?) at 40mph and compared to current levels; deemed to be ‘acceptable’ due to being about the same as current emissions. Emissions not modelled for new scheme at 30mph for comparison – perhaps there would be a worthwhile reduction in emissions at 30mph, we don’t know (esp. considering AQAP).  Pedestrian and cyclist movements not modelled, and we quote, “Whilst the movements of cyclists and pedestrians were not part of the actual modelling, the crossing requirements of these users have been included in the design.” – but e.g. Livesey St [removal of] crossing is a substantial disbenefit to pedestrians, with the justification given during the cabinet member meeting sidelining the issue of how long it would take to cross the road with a weird comment that students would be able to reach McDonalds more easily(!). There are currently issues of congestion/conflict at some traffic lights for those walking or cycling that don’t appear to be addressed in this scheme, which have been videod by CycleSheffield members
  2. Not all aspects of changing the speed limit had been considered Major justifications given for 40mph included ‘signing’ 30mph, and the idea that the new bus lane from Hillfoot Bridge to Hillsborough Barracks would provide cyclists with some protection. However, the 40mph would apply both inbound and outbound (no ‘protection’ on inbound section), and from Hillfoot Bridge to Shalesmoor, where no changes are planned (includes junctions with Rutland Road and Green Lane – already difficult and/or dangerous junctions for pedestrians and cyclists to cross, and some too-narrow cycle lanes for 40mph). A tacit acceptance of SYP’s approach to speed limit enforcement, but no consideration given to e.g. stronger 30mph signing at Shalesmoor (such as a ‘30’ painted on-carriageway), or speed indication devices later on – or repeater speed camera signs including ‘30’.
  3. Some roads may also not have been properly considered for the effect on pedestrians of a 40mph limit. E.g. on the south of Penistone Road in this stretch (Montgomery Terrace Road, Gilpin St, Flora St etc; also note the new retail residential and retail developments nearby). No recognition seems to have been given to the issue of faster traffic when vehicles turn into side roads/accesses etc re. pedestrian and cyclist safety.
  4. The Cycle Audit was done after the event for this design. This means opportunities were missed, such as exploring segregated on-footway cycle provision, and priority for turning traffic still tending towards favouring the motorist (at side roads, accesses etc). Ther are some improvements with tighter radiused turnings and painted priority, but this feels very bolt-on. Instead there would seem to have been opportunities for e.g. raised plateaus at some of these points (there are a total of 30 side roads / accesses etc. from Herries Road through to Shalesmoor)
  5. NB LTN 2/08 1.7.3  Cycle Audits may be undertaken at up to four stages of the design process: preparation of a design brief; preliminary design; detailed design; substantial completion and LTN 2/08 1.7.7 When planning a new road scheme or other major works, high-quality cycle and pedestrian links should be considered from the outset, rather than being left until later. (…)
  6. Cyclesheffield’s objections were misrepresented.  Apparently Cycle Sheffield objected to the scheme for 4 reasons including, and we quote, ‘Speed limit will result in vehicles slowing down and speeding up between junctions’, which is not a direct quote to completely trivialise what we wrote and be dismissive of the consultation process. Cycle Sheffield objections are shown as 4 quotations taken from our letter, but they are not direct quotations so should not be presented as such.
  7. The argument that the money is for a scheme for cars not bikes (or peds).  The central government money is to increase capacity (rather than reduce congestion), but this only accounts for £3m of the £5m (is the other £2m Sainsburys?); meanwhile the cycle budget was halved in the prior financial year: If money is an issue for the cycle/pedestrian aspects of the design, why aren’t those budgets used too. Also what about LSTF, which was to have funded the section from HLC to Herries Road anyway?
  8. In summary CycleSheffield think that the officers’ case was incomplete and illogical.  We are concerned that the final argument seemed to be, well if we don’t do this now we will lose the money.  This puts the cllrs making the decision under pressure to accept a scheme that is inadequate for a major route north and which also carries NCN 627 a major Sustrans Route (and one of the proposed Green routes!).  More thought about and earlier consultation with all users of this route would have made a better scheme which will need retrofitting sooner rather than later.

4 CycleSheffield’s objection to planning application for the Graves Leisure Centre.  We looked at this in detail as we think that leisure centres, especially ones entrusted to SIV by SCC should encourage active travel.  We surveyed the site and the areas around it and compared our survey to the one done by consultants.  We also scrutinised the  proposed travel plan.  WE have submitted our ‘technical’ arguments on the planning website and written to relevant cllrs, officers, the CEO of SIV and Chair of SCT with our moral, as well as technical. objections

  1. The survey on the planning application had not properly surveyed cycling infrastructure, e.g. routes and toucan crossings were missing, even ones at the site or on the Sheffield Cycle Map were missed. A path at the back of the site had not been properly surveyed.
  2. Low cost enhancements, in proportion for total costs of the project, for cycling facilities were missed
  3. Cycling was not considered as a realistic way of getting to the site or a mode of transport that can be increased by changes in the overall plan; the number of bike stands was 10. (Yet SIV advertise jobs at minimum, not living, wage and 33% of Sheffield dwellings do not have access to a car)
  4. We make similar comments about the inadequacy of the survey of pedestrian access. And we also note, “… the connectivity for residents in Jordanthorpe, Batemoor and Lowedges are not mentioned because these residential districts are not even mentioned.” Astonishing.
  5. We also critiqued the failure to consider the impact on air quality of the traffic flows to the site on routes through other locations eg Woodseats.
  6. We expect flagship centres to promote the best possible practice wrt active travel.  For example, it is not only ironic but also stupid to have more people than needs be drive to a leisure centre to then sit and spin on a static bicycle. We expect planning applications, such as these, to address issues of fairness so that all citizens, even the ones in the three adjacent districts, can see them as places for themselves.
  7. As far as we understand the process, the consultants who drew up this planning application were advised by SCC officers. The planning application would have been scrutinised by SCC officers.  Two CycleSheffield members spent a morning surveying the site and a day reading the application and writing up the objections.  We wonder why can we, interested amateurs, spot things that professional consultants & professional officers can’t?
  8. We do not want to be picking holes in things but sometimes we have to.  Our work shows that something is awry in the planning process.  It is not our job to tell SIV, SCT and SCC what is wrong; it is their job to get it right.

JE James and Giant supporting Space for Cycling!

CycleSheffield are pleased to announce  that JE James and Giant Sheffield are supporting Space for Cycling

This week they are tying a Space4Cycling goody bag to every bike serviced or sold S4C goody bag and if you want one so you can wear the badge and put the bike placard and sticker on your bike then you can pop in to pick one up. Give the leaflets to friends and colleagues and once you have been on the Big Ride

S4C big ride photo

please get along to JE James CycleFest all weekend at the Norfolk Arms, Ringinglow

cyclefest flyer

Still not heard of Space for Cycling?

Space for Cycling

is our big campaign this spring for the local elections

and through into next year for the local and General Elections

We want local and national politicians to commit to cycling by making sure that there is

SPACE FOR CYCLING

Find out what our demands are and follow the campaign on

www.cyclesheffield,org.uk/space4cycling

 Like the Space4CyclingSheff fb page to stay updated

or follow us on @S4CSheffield

and also like the cyclesheffield  fb page

and follow us on @cycleSheffield

 

 

Decorate your bikes on Sat May 10 ready for the Sheffield Space for Cycling Ride on Sat May 17

S4C decorated bike

Hello folks, come & join two wheelers young and old for

Bike Decorating
Sat 10th May
10am-1pm
at Devonshire Green
Make use of our free selection of art materials (plus bring anything you might have at home) to get your bike decorated and looking its best ahead for the
Sheffield Space For Cycling Ride on Saturday May 17
The colour to go for is RED – for decoration and to wear on the day
Bring yourself, a colleague, a friend, your family
Please pass on details of this event to anyone you think might be interested.
There is a flyer at this link – http://www.mediafire.com/view/c5kpd7eurd3pv/Space%20For%20Cycling%20Resources#lgnzta2dbabckte – and you can post that up at work
And then ride your decorated bike all week as part of the preparation for Saturday May 17
We will probably have a Facebook event for it in due course, as is the way these days!
Cheers
Emma
P.s There is also bike decorating happening in Graves Park this month to do with the Tour de France which I have only discovered today. We didn’t copy their idea – just had the same idea! (because it’s a good idea!)
S4C decorated bike

Space for Cycling and fresh expert advice on Designing for Cycling

Just when you want some fresh ideas on Space for Cycling and guidance for design infrastructure then three of them turn up at once!  They are complementary and designed for slightly different audiences.

1. The CTC have produced a concise guide for decision makers, eg councillors, council officers, on how infrastructure needs to be designed for Space for Cycling.

It’s called Space for Cycling: a guide for local decision makers, and it is here at

http://www.ctc.org.uk/sites/default/files/1404-space-for-cycling-guide-local-decision-makers.pdf

and CycleSheffield will be sending hard copies to relevant councillors, council officers and local MPs as a softening up exercise for next year’s General Election.

2. There is also a much beefier booklet, Making Space for Cycling, written on behalf of CycleNation by the Cambridge Cycle Campaign for highway engineers and transport planners

I only have a two copies of that and I will send one to the SCC Cycle Champion, David Caulfield and keep one for CycleSheffield.

Its at

http://www.makingspaceforcycling.org/

3. Sustrans have produced a Handbook for Cycle Friendly Design which is a detailed set of advice and guidance for design of roads to cater for cyclist in urban and rural settings.  It’s so good it is amazing that it is free!

http://www.sustrans.org.uk/news/new-handbook-cycle-friendly-design